Over 58620
politifake

Green Politics


My Contribution To Tree-Hugging, Vegetarian Liberals -




GLOBAL WARMING MYTH - Green Liberals state that Global Warming is endangering polar bears. However, the fact is that their numbers have increased from 5K to 25K since 1970. Consider that another liberal lie debunked!


TAGS: liberals green eco liars
Rating: 4.54/5

More politifakes by WTFO

crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 5:36 pm
No kidding.
crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 5:26 pm
You're the only person who's spoken about the incident in a positive light, OTC. For the third time now, just sayin'.
crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 5:24 pm
ST, you could be standing at the North Pole, with orders to march south, and you still wouldn't be able to point in the right direction.
StoneTools - August 30, 2013, 3:10 pm
The court reports mention todd being armed with a pistol, not an a**ault rifle
StoneTools - August 30, 2013, 3:08 pm
you left out part of your sentence, it should have been "managed to shoot over 40 unarmed people in 5 minutes"
OTC - August 30, 2013, 3:05 pm
You talking about the point that some one shooting a closely gathered group of unarmed people inside a building is not that huge of an accomplishment as you seem to think it is?
StoneTools - August 30, 2013, 2:31 pm
try reading threads before you post a reply on a comment, please. It's getting to be really old when I have to keep pointing you in the right direction.
crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 1:42 pm
Who ST?
crankyhead - August 30, 2013, 1:28 pm
OTC, in order for me to miss your point, you actually have to have a point.
StoneTools - August 30, 2013, 1:06 am
and he was armed with an a**ault rifle as you stated in your poster?
OTC - August 29, 2013, 11:37 pm
As usual, you missed the point, and I'm obtuse?
crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:08 pm
... promoting, pursuing or pushing his agenda. Clear enough?
crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:07 pm
Are you really so obtuse that you believe I'm trying to glorify him? I'm gonna say this once, for you OTC, because apparently you can't figure it out on your own. I don't respect any man who resorts to violence, or threats of violence, as a means for...
crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:05 pm
...and nope.
crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:05 pm
Nope.
crankyhead - August 29, 2013, 1:05 pm
The court reports are online OTC.
OTC - August 28, 2013, 4:32 pm
So, was Mark Todd inside or outside the building when the shooting started?
OTC - August 28, 2013, 4:31 pm
So, was Mark Todd inside or outside the building when the shooting started?
StoneTools - August 28, 2013, 1:39 pm
and it doesn't make the professionally trained, UNARMED soldiers armed either, does it?
StoneTools - August 28, 2013, 1:38 pm
correct, but it still doesn't make Mark Todd armed with an a**ault rifle, now does it?
OTC - August 28, 2013, 1:08 pm
You mean a coward who sh** a closely gathered group of unsuspecting unarmed soldiers?
crankyhead - August 28, 2013, 12:03 pm
Thank you for admitting that it is possible, for one heavily armed man, to shoot four dozen professionally trained soldiers, with a pistol, in under 5 minutes.
StoneTools - August 27, 2013, 4:46 pm
You might want to look up the FN Five Seven pistol. It's not your every day, run of the mill pistol. It takes 20 and 30 round magazines and he had around 400 rounds on him in those 20 and 30 round magazines.
crankyhead - August 27, 2013, 1:37 pm
... the walk-in refrigerator. Simple enough, or do I need to dumb that down some more?
crankyhead - August 27, 2013, 1:36 pm
Can't speak for all liberals here OTC, but if you were to ask me, I'd say that no, I don't believe that. I do, however, believe that an army base, as a general rule, would have more weapons present in it's armories, than say, a Chucky Cheese has, in...
crankyhead - August 27, 2013, 1:34 pm
Speaking of ignorant, what kind of weapon was Hasan armed with, when he managed to shoot over 40 people in under 5 minutes? What kind of weapon was he using, that left some 200 spent shell casings littered all over the ground?
OTC - August 27, 2013, 1:15 pm
Do liberals really think soldiers on military bases are armed 24/7, sleep with, eat with, and perform daily duties with their weapons on hand?
StoneTools - August 26, 2013, 11:26 pm
do tell how your definition of heavily armed applies to someone with a pistol. The stupid idea here is that hasan was surrounded by heavily armed soldiers during his shooting spree
StoneTools - August 26, 2013, 11:21 pm
Does that mean that you are finally willing to admit that you are full of crap about the poster yet? Or are you still going to prove your ignorance.
crankyhead - August 26, 2013, 8:12 pm
As for the other one; Surrounded: The relationship that your mind shares with stupid ideas.
crankyhead - August 26, 2013, 8:11 pm
Fine. Heavily armed, to me, means being armed well enough to injure three dozen soldiers, and kill another thirteen all by your lonesome, on the largest military base in North America, in under 5 minutes. Clear enough for ya, or should I dumb that down?
StoneTools - August 26, 2013, 9:03 am
CH, define heavily armed, then define surround. I think, if you are honest for the first time on this site, you will find that Todd was neither heavily armed nor surrounding hasan. So that means you, once again, are full of it.
crankyhead - August 26, 2013, 8:25 am
ST, I got two words for ya: Sergeant Todd.
StoneTools - August 24, 2013, 2:20 pm
Let me translate that for you: Why use facts when you can act like crankyhead and just spew bs and try to weasel out of explaining the stupidity of it (see his "surrounded by heavily armed soldiers" poster and subsequent *** dancing
crankyhead - August 24, 2013, 12:01 pm
Why use data at all, when you have unsubstantiated opinion, to use in it's place? #sarcasm
Scramblus - August 24, 2013, 8:09 am
Global warming isnt the primary cause of previous population declines. It's an anticipated one for future ecological problems. But why use science when you can Cherry pick data?


Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -




Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -




Warmist Insanity: Climate Change Is Causing Child Marriage -




IT'S NOT EASY BEING GREEN - Kermit demonstrates the Obama green energy policy- (as in what it will do to the American Public).




Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -


TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward


REUTERS: GM LOSES $49K ON EACH VOLT - The Chevy Volt is the perfect image of the Obama regime. It's unpopular, impractical, a green failure, and bleeds red ink.




ROSEANNE BARR - Thinks military personnel, families, and retirees are "on the dole".




Liberal Science Deniers -




THIS WEEKS OBAMA GREEN FAILURES - Solar Trust of America LLC, files bankruptcy - $2.1 Billion in DOE loan guarantees. A123 Systems, subject of investor class action suit - $279 million in DOE loans Both sure to be ignored by the Lamestream Media




RENEWABLE GREEN ENERGY - Just Print More Money




VOTE GREEN PARTY -




Climate Change = Agenda 21 & Globalization -




Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


SOLYNDRA GREEN - IT'S MADE FROM OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY AND GIVEN BACK TO OBAMA IN $100,000.00 INCREMENTS.




WIND TURBINES - Setting new standards for reliability and cost.




GET USED TO IT AMERICA - These are the only Green Jobs that are going to result from Obamunism.




Loony Liberals -




OBAMA'S GREEN ENERGY POLICY - 1: Donors give Obama their Green for his campaign warchest. 2: Obama gives them our green in return. 3: Green company takes our green and folds


TAGS: green policy losers not winners
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - October 11, 2012, 10:59 pm
its called cronyism
arnnatz - October 11, 2012, 9:54 am
sounds legit


ELECTRIC CAR'S DIRTY LITTLE SECRET - Rolling off the assembly line, an electric car's footprint has left the same C02 footprint of a conventional car driven 80,000 miles! Electric cars also use fossil fuel to recharge!




GREEN POLICE - America would laugh if they weren't knocking on our door.




TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT PAYOFFS - 1939 German U-Boat - Range 90 miles per charge 2011 Chevy Volt - Range 40 miles per charge - w/out heat or AC Another Obama Green Technology bet pays off.




SOLAR-GATE - Not going away.




SUDDENLY - Democrats are concerned about a black candidate with no resume or experience




BROCOBAMA - As green as you can get


TAGS: obama green
Rating: 3.57/5

More politifakes by Lboy



OBAMACARE: NULL AND VOID - Judges are now agreeing with what we already knew- Obamacare was a pot full of shit that stunk to high heaven. Lets see if the Admin follows the court- stay tuned




RELIABLE ENERGY - we be cooking on the wood stove tonight




" SOLYNDRA GATE ? " - Two U.S. congressman are asking the WH for all documents related to the fed. gov’s $535 million loan guarantee.




Climate Crusader DiCaprio -




LIVE THE GREEN DREAM! - Move to North Korea




Climate Change Is The Global Crisis Key To Unlock The New World Order -


TAGS: climate change global crisis key unlock the new world order gordon brown quote global warming hoax greenies warmists alarmists hysterians eco fascism socialism nwo ipcc
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - May 5, 2015, 12:39 pm
Bottom line, the data was fudged. Lies Lies and d***ed lies.


VERMONT - Let's give it back to the Russians.




REMINDER -




Yoda Wisdom -




HIDE YOUR COWS! - The Green Nazis of Obama's EPA now use military surveillance drones to monitor American farmers. Your tax dollars at work.




" FISKER KARMA – HALF A BILLION FEDERAL DOLLARS. " - Fisker is manufacturing these gorgeous Leonardo DiCaprio toys in Finland. Creating 500 jobs overseas with American taxpayers’ money. “All the choices we've made have been the right ones”




OBAMA: “CHANGE . . . IS DRIVING CARS THAT GET 55 MILES PER GALLON” - Change is the decisions we made to stop waiting for a Congress to do something about our oil addiction.




STOCK MARKET TIP OF THE DAY - Don't invest in the Obama/Biden Hedge Fund Chevy Volt - Fisker Karma




" 05 MAY 2012 SCOTLAND " - Obama "I will be very clear in voicing my belief that we're going to have to take further steps to deal with climate change in a serious way."




CELEBRATING AMERICA -




" GLOBAL WARMING & GREEN ENERGY SCAM " - Obama: "I will be very clear in voicing my belief that we're going to have to take further steps to deal with climate change in a serious way."




THE SOYLENT GREEN PRESIDENCY - Cass Sunsteen alludes that the government has a right to harvest organs before patients die!




IMMUTABLE TRUTH - The green agenda just drives us much more deeper in the red.




" RORSCHACH INKBLOTS " - Make more sense than Obama pushing for Solar Energy. German and Chinese Solar Firms Battle for Survival.




Obama said: 'You can keep your insurance if you like it.' -




REPUBLICANS CRITICAL OF NAVY'S 'GREAT GREEN FLEET', $26 A GALLON FUEL. - The so-called "drop-in" fuels are derived from seeds, algae and chicken fat. Anyone interested in a bridge for sale?




This is going to be fun -




Once Upon A Time in South Africa -




GREEN JOBS - President Obama advises us, if we can't afford high gasoline prices, then get rid of our SUV's and replace them with hybrids.




AMERICA'S GREEN QUAGMIRE - The greening of the country, including the creation of green jobs, has proven unworkable and expensive.




The Greens -




Sarah Hanson Young -


TAGS: shy dumb young stupid green
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by MrScorpio

Zeitguy - July 30, 2014, 10:52 pm
She must be Australian. Consistently voted the most humorous of all continents.


The Green Fog -




WHILE YOU WERE DISTRACTED - Another Obama "Green Energy" company, Abound Solar Inc. of Colorado, goes bankrupt after taking $70 million in taxpayer money.




" OBAMANOMICS " - Suppose you could produce $50 of electricity but it cost you $100 to do so. Would that make any sense? It would if you work at the White House.




Man-Made Maunder Minimum -




SOOOOOOOO - Who is going to jail for this? Anyone? Steven Chu is the new Bernie Madhoff. Solar ponzi scheme




why is it When deniers of man made climate change say "let's talk science" -


TAGS: greenland ice sheet project data
Rating: 4.6/5

More politifakes by Curlyrocks

Curlyrocks - August 22, 2014, 1:44 pm
Thx Emma, even the most hardened GW denier wants to keep volatile hydrocarbons out their drinking water and growing land.
Curlyrocks - August 22, 2014, 1:08 pm
Methane CH4, Methanol CH3-OH. Methanol is made primarily by running methane over a catalyst with steam.
EmmaRoydes - August 22, 2014, 9:51 am
I didn't see where Curly said you make methane from natural gas, but referred to the wasted gas from burning leaking gases instead of capturing and preserving them.
bubbagrump - August 22, 2014, 9:31 am
You un don't make methane from natural gas, genius. Methane IS natural gas. NSTFU.
Curlyrocks - August 21, 2014, 12:42 pm
Nuclear power needs to get off the old dirty disaster prone reactors ASAP. When fracking gets in your water it's from a leaky pipe, which I demand a better standard of. We will switch to renewable energy but it will be a slower process than expected.
Zeitguy - August 21, 2014, 12:03 am
Buddy, I am so on board with you on nuclear energy as the stepping stone. Fracking is fine as long as it is not in my water table. But the main goal is an investment shift from non renewables to economically feasible renewables. Thanks for your insight.
Curlyrocks - August 20, 2014, 11:03 pm
LNG use and production also leave less of a carbon footprint than standered oil and gasoline production and use, but escaping methane is apparently again a problem, but any slef respecting energy company wants that energy so it will get captured.
Curlyrocks - August 20, 2014, 11:01 pm
and can readily be switched into existing infrastructure and equipment, or at least more easily than LNG. Coal extraction can be considerably slowed thanks to fracking but will always be necessary for steel production and other metal smelting.
Curlyrocks - August 20, 2014, 10:58 pm
ng reserves, I would like to see more of the 4th gen reactors Terror talks about replace existing reactors in the next 10 years, no new old design nukes allowed. Again a slow change to methanol as it can easily be made from natural gas, burns clean...
Curlyrocks - August 20, 2014, 10:56 pm
Thanks to fracking we have maybe another 80-90 years with current methods and 100-110 when they clean it up. (for real if you're squeezing the rocks for every last hydrocarbon at least collect up all the methane don't flare it or leak it) on top of existi
Zeitguy - August 20, 2014, 10:37 pm
Regardless of this we must appreciate the fact that in 50 years our nonrenewable resources will be depleted and other options will have to be readily available.
Zeitguy - August 20, 2014, 10:01 pm
Your personal faith regarding the impact of current trends is somewhat negligent. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but to dismiss it as trivial may reflect your preconceived beliefs.
Curlyrocks - August 20, 2014, 7:04 pm
Man made CO2 might make the graph a little steeper this time and it may top out slightly higher but it's not the end of the world, it's not going to cause as major an impact as people think and it's not really avoidable with or without gov intervention.
Curlyrocks - August 20, 2014, 5:40 pm
It's probably the best idea. I only oppose people who want to shut down the current oil and gas infrastructure that we have invested a lot of time and resources in.
Zeitguy - August 20, 2014, 5:13 pm
Is it not in our best interest to start aggressively developing the infrastructure for renewable energy sources while we still have the benefits of oil and gas?
Curlyrocks - August 20, 2014, 1:54 pm
only harms your position. Throwing us into a 3rd or 2nd world standard of living due to carbon tax or energy rationing is unacceptable, especially while we try to invent and implement new sources of energy.
Curlyrocks - August 20, 2014, 1:51 pm
Oil and coal extraction are not going to stop. We need energy to support a decent standard of life for a rapidly growing population and there's a perfectly good source under our feet. constantly trying to shut the industry down rather than cleaning it up
birddseedd - August 20, 2014, 8:58 am
not that global warming/climate change has one shred of evidence, but, the heck does taxes have to do with it?
terroraustralis - August 20, 2014, 8:20 am
because its really frustrating talking to f***ing idiots. if they shut the f*** up about how they think its not real, people MIGHT actually listen to them when it comes to "why carbon taxes are the worst thing a liberal government can do to its nation"
Zeitguy - August 19, 2014, 9:35 pm
Understandable that climate change is a recurring phenomenon of earth history. But dismissing that recent human activity is innocent of recent changes can be considered as politically or economically motivated.


WE MIGHT SELL IT TO OBAMA JUST PUT 'MADE IN CHINA' ON IT ? - Obama: Use Algae as substitute for oil.The Department of Energy spends $85 million on research projects "to develop algal biofuels," Obama is committing another $14 million to the idea.




HEH! OBAMA SAYS HE’LL GET THE ECONOMY “GOING FULL GUNS” - Yeah with you and the unicorn you rode in on




SODA BOTTLE LIGHTS IN THE ROOF - After all the money went to Solyndra and other contributors, all we'll have left for green jobs will be rooftop soda bottle lighting like in the Phillipines




" IF THE GREEN GLOVE FITS " - Obama has promised to create 5 million "green-collar jobs". Seen any lately?




PROPHECY FAIL - THE SCAM IS OVER - Data shows that Global Warming is the Religion of the Stupid. Search continues for UN's 50 million missing climate refugees.




" PASS THE BILL......IF YOU LOVE ME " - Obama Was A LightSquared Investor!




Greenpeace Hypocrisy -




GREEN ECONOMY - Ancedotal evidence #45938 that the 2009 stimulus is a big, fat FAIL.




GREEN ENERGY - Not there when you need it most. Hideously expensive when you can get it.




VOLCANOES - Emitting more green house gases eons before man became Industrialized




MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING - A grain of sand on the beach compared to what Mother Nature does.




Sarah Hanson Young -




" YOU'RE SURE THERE'S A LACK OF TREES HERE ?" - President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama participate in tree plantings at the Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens. Or is it burying the dog bones?




DEEPWATER REICHSTAG - Its not like Obama would let the BP spill become a massive catastrophe to help him push harder for "greener" energy, right?




" GAS GUZZLER - IN - CHIEF " - Obama To Use New Secret Service Armored Bus On Campaign Trail.




OLD SCHOOL WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY - There's no school like the old school.




SUDDENLY - Democrats are concerned about a black candidate with no resume or experience




QUESTION FOR VERMONT MOONBATS - When your electric bill quadruples after 2012, then what? Windmills? Solar panels?




OBAMA'S ELECTRIC CAR - The new Volt from GM (govt motors) is far more expensive than much better cars. Do you think this 'green' toy can out perform them? BTW, most electricity comes from burning coal.




ALVIN GREENE - Amrican Hero and Defender of TATER TOTS




GREEN JOBS - Get Yours Today Franchises Are Still Available




ALVIN GREENE DEMOCRAT - No Experience and No Resume and the White Liberal Media Goes Nuts Trying to Expose Him. Odd, Would you say?




BIG OIL - Creating Green Jobs for Unemployed Liberals




THE EARTH - Our current way of living is unsustainable. We should not conserve it.


TAGS: green
Rating: 2.64/5

More politifakes by Jrock



TOO BIG TO FAIL -




THE ONLY WAY RMONEY GETS MY VOTE - IS BY HOLDING A TEAPOT TO MY HEAD


TAGS: rooibos oolong green white
Rating: 1.65/5

More politifakes by ughomer

KALKAM - October 18, 2012, 11:54 am
Medicare reimburses less now...speak to a healthcare professional in Florida and ask how the Obamacare phase in is going...or not...this poster will stand as your refusal to stop it.


GREEN ENERGY - It will create jobs and save our planet.




Greens -




Albert Gore -




Obama's Global Warming Stupidity -




Uh-oh, Greenies! -


TAGS: global warming hoax climate change scam electric cars fossil fuels carbon co2 coal powered cars alarmist fail silly greenies
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - March 28, 2015, 12:15 pm
I used to make this argument myself but actually, it does burn less and is more efficient to have one large plant everyone ***s into, rather than run millions of independent, small internal combustion engines. It's probably not a large difference though.


Liberal Science Deniers -




Al "Not So Sharp" Sharpton -




Weapons-Grade Global Warming Stupidity -




Commiefornia Gov. Moonbeam Proves Yet Again He's a Moronic Moonbat -




Has Anybody Told the DNC What Obama’s EPA Just Announced About Airplane Emissions? -




Eco-Fascists: The "Green Wing" of the Nazi Party -


TAGS: eco fascists green wing nazi party green religion greenies alarmists warmists socialism climate change junk science global warming scam agenda21 hysterians
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 27, 2015, 3:40 am
"A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire :P
fauxnews - April 26, 2015, 11:04 pm
"I have a theory that you can make any sentence seem profound by writing the name of a dead philosopher at the end of it. -Plato." (Banksy) www.twitter.com/SteveCarell/status/583642179710496769
calron - April 26, 2015, 7:59 pm
"There is perhaps no phenomenon which contains so much destructive feeling as moral indignation, which permits envy or hate to be acted out under the guise of virtue." — Erich Fromm


Grandma Clinton To Make 'Climate Change' A Top Agenda Item -




Democrat War On Coal -




Global Warming Junk Science -




The Ever-Greater Pause -




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE